Mark Carney's unique approach to governance and communication has left an indelible mark on Canadian politics, with his distinct language and strategies becoming part of the national discourse. One of the most intriguing aspects is his government's penchant for memorandums of understanding (MOUs), which have become a central feature of their work and a key tool for branding and communication.
The Rise of the MOU
MOUs, once obscure business-school jargon, have swiftly entered the public lexicon under Carney's leadership. These agreements, often non-binding, serve as a preliminary step to ensure all parties are aligned on broad goals before embarking on complex projects. In the private sector, they're a first move towards a longer contractual agreement, while in the public realm, they're particularly useful for governments to find common ground on various issues.
Impact and Interpretation
Jeremy Barretto, a regulatory partner at Torys LLP, emphasizes the real-world impact of MOUs, despite their non-binding nature. He believes governments take them seriously and work towards the outlined goals. This perspective is shared by Michael Wernick, former clerk of the Privy Council, who describes MOUs as a form of 'alignment exercise,' helping different levels of government move in the same direction.
A Deeper Look
Wernick's analysis of the recent Alberta-B.C. MOU reveals an interesting dynamic. He suggests that this agreement represents a shift in expectations, with Alberta and the oil and gas sector finally accepting the unlikelihood of an oil pipeline to northwest B.C. Similarly, B.C. Premier David Eby has seemingly accepted the reality of oil traffic through southern terminals.
The Bigger Picture
The use of MOUs raises broader questions about governance and federalism. While they may be a useful tool for alignment and branding, the real challenge lies in the implementation and delivery of these complex agreements. As Wernick puts it, 'Are you actually going to hit the mark on all these strategies and frameworks?' This is the true test of governance, and one that Carney's government will need to navigate carefully.
Conclusion
The rise of the MOU under Mark Carney's government is an intriguing development, offering a unique insight into the art of governance and communication. While these agreements may be a starting point, their impact and interpretation are far-reaching, shaping the direction of the country and its relationships with various stakeholders. As we move forward, the true test will be in the implementation and delivery of these strategies, a challenge that will define Carney's legacy.
